A failed baseline is still useful information.
VIGIL’s checker units pass their focused tests, but the full M0 regression hasn’t passed yet. The latest runtime result is inconclusive. I need to get the baseline working and rerun it before I can say anything about reliability.
These numbers are still goals.
PULSAR-4X aims to combine four 500 MS/s channels for 2.0 GS/s total. There’s no implementation or measurement yet, so treat that figure as a target, not a result.
The fixed-point details matter.
MHDA’s reported gain and hardware/software error only make sense alongside the fixed-point behavior and simulation setup that produced them. Without those details, it’s hard to reproduce the numbers.
I want to understand the whole flow.
I’m learning how RTL decisions affect synthesis, timing, physical design, and testing. Scripts and repeatable checks help me retrace how I got each result.